Katherine Duke
Philosophy of Film
Dr. Langguth
5 May 2014
Citizen Kane – The Emotional Manipulation
The
movie Citizen Kane is widely regarded
as one of the greatest movies of all time. Its beautiful cinematography and
captivating plot are just a few of its best qualities. It is interesting that
so many people feel so strongly about the movie and have felt such an emotional
connection with the characters after viewing it.
According
to Carroll, feeling emotional responses relies largely on sympathy. That is to
say, because sympathy is directed at others and because it is a supportive
response, sympathy is often what causes an emotional bond with characters. This
means that the viewer feels the inclined towards benevolent action, an impulse
that one may feel more freely due to the assurance that it is a feeling one
need not act upon since it is toward a fictional character.
This
feeling of sympathy towards Kane is established near the beginning of the movie
when the viewer is informed of the difficult childhood Kane had. According to
the movie, Kane was sent away from his family at a very young age and raised by
a banker and a board of trustees. He is portrayed to have had a lonely
childhood and to have been denied one of the few things he truly wanted, his
sled Rosebud.
This
show of vulnerability and unhappiness makes the viewer feel sympathy for Kane
as a child, which translates into feeling sympathy for Kane as a grown adult.
This causes an emotional connection with Kane that carries throughout the film,
and is sustained through various instances that cause additional waves of
sympathy.
For
example, the movie refers several times to his failed political career, which
we discover is due to the blackmailing of Kane by another man. The flashback
containing this information continues to elicit a sympathetic response from the
audience, illustrating the two unhappy marriages Kane has throughout his life.
Additionally,
throughout the entire film we know that Kane dies, as is shown in the opening
scene, alone in his giant mansion. We later learn that Kane built this mansion
in an attempt to create a place of sheer bliss; a dream which we learn would
never come true. He was alone and unhappy, surrounded by his many belongings
and his staff, who was more interested in his money than his welfare. This
causes the audience to agonize over the fact that, according to all of the
evidence, Kane dies unhappy and alone, wishing for someone or something called “rosebud”.
How could one not feel sympathy for such a man?
According
to Carroll, sympathy is perceived to be an emotion and causes the viewer to
feel distress when a character is distressed, as well as relief and
satisfaction when the character is safe and/or happy. Citizen Kane does not give the viewer this satisfaction in the end.
The audience is left knowing that Kane did not ever receive many of the things
he sought in life, and if he died happy, the viewers are never given any
indication of it.
This causes a lack
of emotional closure, which leaves the viewer unhappy and emotional. This
causes the audience to carry their perceived emotions with them as they leave
the movie, polarizing the reviews of the viewers. Some decide to love the movie
and others choose to despise it. Ultimately, the movie has made an impact on
those who have watched it, which is one of the key elements to a successful
film. In reality, this unrelieved sense of sympathy may be the reason for the success
of the film with such a wide variety of audiences.
Whether one leaves
Citizen Kane adoring it or loathing
it, the emotional manipulation of the movie is very real to viewers. Through
the use of sympathy-inducing images and plot-points, this movie connects with
the audience and causes them to feel some of Kane’s anguish and loneliness.
Through this—for lack of better word—emotional connection, the movie Citizen Kane leaves audience members
wishing they could have comforted Kane in his last moments, placing Rosebud at
his side on his deathbed.
No comments:
Post a Comment